Delegated Authentication Discovery Selection
External identity providers available to CAS are presented to the user and available for discovery and selection using the following strategies.
If you are interested in supporting discovery of SAML2 identity providers using a discovery service, you may want to take a look at this guide.
The following settings and properties are available from the CAS configuration catalog:
Configuration Metadata
The collection of configuration properties listed in this section are automatically generated from the CAS source and components that contain the actual field definitions, types, descriptions, modules, etc. This metadata may not always be 100% accurate, or could be lacking details and sufficient explanations.
Be Selective
This section is meant as a guide only. Do NOT copy/paste the entire collection of settings into your CAS configuration; rather pick only the properties that you need. Do NOT enable settings unless you are certain of their purpose and do NOT copy settings into your configuration only to keep them as reference. All these ideas lead to upgrade headaches, maintenance nightmares and premature aging.
YAGNI
Note that for nearly ALL use cases, declaring and configuring properties listed here is sufficient. You should NOT have to explicitly massage a CAS XML/Java/etc configuration file to design an authentication handler, create attribute release policies, etc. CAS at runtime will auto-configure all required changes for you. If you are unsure about the meaning of a given CAS setting, do NOT turn it on without hesitation. Review the codebase or better yet, ask questions to clarify the intended behavior.
Naming Convention
Property names can be specified in very relaxed terms. For instance cas.someProperty
, cas.some-property
, cas.some_property
are all valid names. While all
forms are accepted by CAS, there are certain components (in CAS and other frameworks used) whose activation at runtime is conditional on a property value, where
this property is required to have been specified in CAS configuration using kebab case. This is both true for properties that are owned by CAS as well as those
that might be presented to the system via an external library or framework such as Spring Boot, etc.
When possible, properties should be stored in lower-case kebab format, such as cas.property-name=value
.
The only possible exception to this rule is when naming actuator endpoints; The name of the
actuator endpoints (i.e. ssoSessions
) MUST remain in camelCase mode.
Settings and properties that are controlled by the CAS platform directly always begin with the prefix cas
. All other settings are controlled and provided
to CAS via other underlying frameworks and may have their own schemas and syntax. BE CAREFUL with
the distinction. Unrecognized properties are rejected by CAS and/or frameworks upon which CAS depends. This means if you somehow misspell a property definition
or fail to adhere to the dot-notation syntax and such, your setting is entirely refused by CAS and likely the feature it controls will never be activated in the
way you intend.
Validation
Configuration properties are automatically validated on CAS startup to report issues with configuration binding, specially if defined CAS settings cannot be
recognized or validated by the configuration schema. The validation process is on by default and can be skipped on startup using a special system
property SKIP_CONFIG_VALIDATION
that should be set to true
. Additional validation processes are also handled
via Configuration Metadata and property migrations applied automatically on
startup by Spring Boot and family.
Indexed Settings
CAS settings able to accept multiple values are typically documented with an index, such as cas.some.setting[0]=value
. The index [0]
is meant to be
incremented by the adopter to allow for distinct multiple configuration blocks.
Menu Selection
This is the default and most common strategy that allows external identity providers to be listed on the login page, allowing the user to order one from the menu and select one from the list of options.
Dynamic Selection
Rather than listing all available identity providers, this option allows CAS to auto-select the appropriate
identity provider in a dynamic fashion using pre-defined rules and conditions and
based on the user identifiers such as username, email address, etc. For example, once the user providers
their identifier, i.e. casuser@example.org
, the discovery strategy can try to select the correct identity provider
based on the email domain.
JSON Rules
By default, the selection rules and conditions can be specified in a JSON file with the following structure:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
{
"@class" : "java.util.HashMap",
"<key-pattern>" : {
"@class" : "org.apereo.cas.pac4j.discovery.DelegatedAuthenticationDynamicDiscoveryProvider",
"clientName" : "SAML2Client",
"order": 0
}
}
The following parameters are available to the JSON resource:
Parameter | Description |
---|---|
<key-pattern> |
Regular expression pattern matched against the user identifier to locate the provider. i.e. .+@example.org . |
clientName |
The client name that should be used for this match, found and defined in CAS configuration. |
order |
The selection sorting order, used to properly sequence and prioritize entries in case there is overlap. |
Custom
If you wish to create your own strategy to dynamically locate identity providers for delegated authentication discovery, you will need to design a component and register it with CAS as such:
1
2
3
4
@Bean
public DelegatedAuthenticationDynamicDiscoveryProviderLocator delegatedAuthenticationDynamicDiscoveryProviderLocator() {
return new CustomDelegatedAuthenticationDynamicDiscoveryProviderLocator();
}
See this guide to learn more about how to register configurations into the CAS runtime.